Hosting in Hong Kong is not the same as hosting in Mainland China. Hong Kong sits outside Mainland China’s internet infrastructure, which means cross-border traffic between Hong Kong and the mainland is still subject to network congestion, filtering, and latency. While Hong Kong hosting removes the need for an ICP license and reduces latency compared to hosting in the US or Europe, it does not address code-level incompatibilities, specifically the third-party resources (e.g., Google Fonts, YouTube embeds, Facebook plugins) that are the primary reason most global websites fail to load in China. Achieving reliable, near-native performance in China requires optimization at both the infrastructure and application layers.
Hong Kong operates under a separate legal and internet infrastructure from Mainland China. It has its own ISPs, its own internet exchange (the HKIX, with over 350 peering participants), and its own regulatory framework. Websites hosted in Hong Kong do not require an ICP license, and content is not subject to the same filtering that applies within the mainland.
However, from a network perspective, traffic between Hong Kong and Mainland China still crosses international gateways. Mainland China has a limited number of submarine cable landing stations and international exit points, and all cross-border traffic passes through these. The result is that Hong Kong-to-mainland traffic experiences higher latency and packet loss than traffic between two cities within the mainland.
In practical terms, Hong Kong is geographically close to the mainland but is not inside it, and the network treats it accordingly.
Hong Kong hosting has some advantages over hosting in the US or Europe for a China-facing audience.
Latency from Hong Kong to major mainland cities is typically 20–40ms, compared to 200–300ms from the US or Europe. This can shave several seconds off initial server response times.
No ICP license is required. This removes a significant regulatory barrier, since obtaining an ICP license requires a Chinese legal entity, Chinese-language documentation, and a review process that can take 20–60 days.
No data localization obligations tied specifically to onshore hosting, though businesses should consult legal counsel regarding China’s PIPL and data security laws depending on the nature of data collected.
It’s a reasonable first step if you’re trying to reduce geographic distance without committing to a full onshore setup.
Where Hong Kong hosting falls short is in addressing the reasons most global websites actually break in China. Proximity to the mainland helps with server response time, but it does nothing for the application layer, which is where the majority of performance issues originate.
A website hosted in Hong Kong still loads the same third-party resources as a website hosted anywhere else. If that site depends on an inexhaustible list of resources such as Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, YouTube embeds, Facebook widgets, Google Maps, or Google Analytics, those requests will still fail or hang when accessed from inside Mainland China. The browser will attempt to resolve blocked domains, time out after repeated failures, and either partially render the page or display nothing at all.
Some Hong Kong hosting providers also route mainland-bound traffic through indirect paths (via Japan, Taiwan, or even the US) to reduce costs, which can negate the latency advantage entirely.
Most modern websites rely on dozens, sometimes hundreds, of third-party resources. These include font libraries, analytics scripts, video players, social media widgets, JavaScript frameworks hosted on external CDNs, tag managers, and more. Many of these are served from domains that are slow or inaccessible in Mainland China.
This is the root cause of most China web performance issues, and it has nothing to do with where your primary hosting is located. A site hosted in Hong Kong, in the US, or even in Mainland China will still experience loading failures if its third-party dependencies are inaccessible.
The incompatibilities are also not static. Resources that work today may stop working tomorrow as network conditions and filtering change. There is no fixed list of blocked domains, and the way individual resources behave in China differs and evolves over time.
This is why changing your hosting location, whether to Hong Kong or anywhere else, is only one piece of the performance equation.
It helps to think about China web performance in two layers: infrastructure and application.
Infrastructure-based solutions address the physical distance and network routing between your server and the end user. This includes hosting location (Hong Kong, Singapore, onshore China) and CDNs. A CDN with nodes in or near China can cache and serve static assets closer to your users, reducing load times for first-party content.
Application-layer (or code-level) optimization addresses the third-party resources your site depends on. A CDN cannot rewrite your site’s code to replace a blocked Google Font with a China-compatible alternative, or swap a YouTube embed for a version that loads in China. These changes happen at the code level, and they require awareness of which resources are incompatible and how to handle each one.
Hong Kong hosting addresses part of the infrastructure layer, as does a CDN. But neither touches the application layer, which is where the most impactful incompatibilities sit.
If the goal is for your website to load fast, fully, and functionally for visitors in Mainland China, hosting in Hong Kong alone is unlikely to get you there.
The third-party resource problem, cross-border network variability, and indirect routing mean that a Hong Kong-hosted site can still take 10–30+ seconds to load, or fail to render key elements altogether.
To put it simply: just because your site is closer to China doesn’t mean it’s ready for China.
Chinafy optimizes websites at both the infrastructure and code levels, handling the third-party resource incompatibilities that hosting and CDNs alone cannot address. This means your existing site, wherever it’s hosted, can achieve near-native onshore performance in China without requiring a rebuild, rehost, or ICP license.
Chinafy works as a bolt-on solution to your existing setup. It identifies and resolves infrastructure-based and code-based incompatibilities, and continues to monitor and adapt as China’s network conditions change over time. This includes automated rule-based optimizations as well as human engineers that can troubleshoot and address issues as they arise.
If you’re wanting your website to work in China, you have more options than having to rebuild your site, move infrastructure onshore, and obtain an ICP license. Get in touch with Chinafy today for a free audit of your site to see how it loads in China.
Disclaimer: This guide is informational and does not constitute legal advice. Chinafy is not a legal or corporate advisory entity, and, given that every business is different, we suggest consulting with your internal legal counsel if you would like advice on any legal or compliance-related concerns, or alternatively we can connect you with one of our partners.
No. ICP licenses are only required for websites hosted on servers within Mainland China. Hong Kong, as a Special Administrative Region, operates under a separate regulatory framework. Websites hosted in Hong Kong do not need an ICP filing or a commercial ICP license.
Compared to hosting in the US or Europe, yes, you’ll likely see lower latency to Mainland China. Typical latency from Hong Kong to mainland cities is around 20–40ms, compared to 200–300ms from the US. However, latency is only one factor in page load time. If your site relies on third-party resources that are slow or blocked in China, moving to Hong Kong hosting alone won’t resolve those issues.
Onshore China hosting means your server is physically located within Mainland China, which provides the lowest latency for mainland visitors and avoids cross-border network congestion. It requires an ICP license, a Chinese legal entity, and compliance with China’s data security regulations. Hong Kong hosting sits outside these requirements but also outside the mainland network, meaning traffic still crosses international gateways with associated latency and packet loss.
A CDN with nodes in or near China can improve delivery of your site’s static first-party assets, such as images, CSS, and JavaScript files hosted on your own domain. However, a CDN cannot rewrite or replace third-party resources that are blocked or slow in China, such as Google Fonts, embedded videos, or social media widgets. For most global websites, these third-party resources are the primary cause of performance failures in China.
Not necessarily. Many companies assume that the only option is to create a separate, China-specific version of their site hosted onshore. Chinafy can optimize your existing site at the code and infrastructure levels so it can achieve near-native onshore performance without requiring a rebuild, rehost, or separate codebase.


